GRAVITY — Financial Model
Financial overview

Gravity — financial model & capital plan

This page summarises Gravity’s revenue model, unit economics, 5-year projections and the $1.0M capital plan ($100k pre-seed → $400k seed → $500k growth) built around an 18–21 month runway and realistic B2B conversion.

All numbers in USD, focused on the base scenario with conservative and upside bands for context. No vanity metrics — only assumptions that tie directly to GMV, revenue and burn.
Revenue model

Four streams tied to concrete, measurable levers.

All revenue comes from commissionable deals, repeat subscriptions and scoped projects — no advertising noise or speculative tokens.

Revenue streams & pricing assumptions

Stream Monetisation Pricing assumption Comment
Commissions % of GMV 4% avg (3–5% band) On launch, mission and data/integration contracts closed via Gravity.
PRO subscriptions SaaS per seat $130 / month ARPU Blend of individual ($50–80) and team/enterprise ($200–500) plans.
Consulting & mission support Project fee $18–26k / project Scope: mission architecture, RFQ prep, partner coordination.
Media & ecosystem Fixed + rev share $40–220k / year (growing) Sponsorships, content integrations, events once audience scales.

Key constraint: all pricing is benchmarked against existing launch/consulting/SaaS practices. No aggressive take-rates that would break provider economics.

Base scenario — revenue composition (Years 1–3)

Year GMV (deals) Commission rev PRO rev Consulting rev Media rev Total rev
Y1 $2.8M (7 deals) $112k $39k $108k $40k $299k
Y2 $8.1M (18 deals) $324k $140k $368k $110k $942k
Y3 $16.0M (32 deals) $640k $312k $728k $220k $1.90M

Assumptions: 4% average take rate on GMV, gradual ramp from 25 to 200 PRO seats, 6 → 28 consulting projects per year, media line scaling with brand and traffic.

Unit economics

Healthy LTV/CAC and high gross margins by design.

Gravity combines high-margin platform revenue with scoped projects. The core thesis: LTV > 3× CAC on PRO and positive contribution per deal from Year 1.

PRO subscription economics

ARPU
$130/mo
Blend of individual & team plans
Gross margin
≈85%
Infra & support only
Retention horizon
24 mo
Conservative mid-term
LTV / seat
$3.1k
$130 × 24 months
CAC (target)
$2.0k
BD + media + sales time
LTV / CAC
≥ 3.0×
Target at scale
Payback
≤ 12 mo
On fully-loaded CAC
Churn (goal)
< 3% / mo
B2B usage, not prosumer

Per-deal economics & gross margin

Type Example ticket Gravity share Gross margin Contribution
Launch / mission deal $400k GMV 4% = $16k ≈90% ≈$14–15k gross profit per deal
Data / service deal $120k GMV 5% = $6k ≈85% ≈$5k gross profit per deal
Consulting project $22k fee Fixed ≈55–60% ≈$12–13k gross profit per project
PRO subscription $1.56k / year Recurring ≈85% ≈$1.3k gross profit per seat / year

Blended gross margin across all streams in the base scenario grows from ≈65–70% in Year 1 to 75–80%+ as platform revenue outweighs consulting.

5-year projections

Scenario planning around realistic B2B ramp-up.

All scenarios share the same structure and differ only in the pace of deal flow, PRO adoption and media/consulting scale.

ARR scenarios (Conservative / Base / Upside)

Year Conservative Base Upside Notes
Year 1 $0.15M $0.30M $0.48M MVP, first deals, early PRO users.
Year 2 $0.40M $0.95M $1.80M GTM scale, partner expansion, repeat clients.
Year 3 $0.90M $1.90M $3.50M Marketplace effects, mobile, deeper tooling.
Year 4 $1.50M $3.20M $6.50M More regions, higher GMV and PRO density.
Year 5 $2.50M $5.00M $12.00M Gravity as default digital entry point to space.
Conservative Base Upside
Y1
$0.15–0.48M
Y2
$0.40–1.80M
Y3
$0.90–3.50M
Y4
$1.50–6.50M
Y5
$2.50–12.0M

Operational drivers behind the base case

Year # deals GMV Avg GMV / deal PRO seats (end of year) Consulting projects
Y1 7 $2.8M $400k 25 6
Y2 18 $8.1M $450k 90 16
Y3 32 $16.0M $500k 200 28

These volumes sit within the GTM funnel: per region 150–200 target accounts → 40–60 conversations → 10–20 qualified opportunities → 3–6 pilots → 1–3 closed deals. Multiply by several priority regions over time and the base case is reachable without “unicorn curves”.

Cost structure & runway

$500k seed plan → 18–21 months of focused execution.

Spend is concentrated on product, engineering and GTM — no vanity burn. Modelled average gross burn ≈ $25k/month over the period.

Use of funds — $500k seed plan

Category Share Amount Notes
Product & engineering 40% $200k RFQ engine, catalog DB, matching logic, dashboards, security, QA.
Team (core salaries) 30% $150k CTO (partial), 2 senior engineers, product, BD lead, media lead, ops.
GTM & partnerships 10% $50k BD travel, conferences, CRM, pilot acquisition costs.
Media & branding 6% $30k Gravity Media content, PR, SEO, events/webinars.
Legal & compliance 4% $20k Entity structure, contracts, IP and data agreements.
Infrastructure & cloud 5% $25k Hosting, monitoring, security and tooling.
Reserve / buffer 5% $25k Runway buffer and opportunistic spending.

At full $500k deployed, pure-burn runway (no revenue) is ~18–20 months. With revenue from Year 1, effective runway extends further without raising earlier.

Burn profile & hiring cadence (illustrative)

Phase Months Key hires Gross burn / month Net burn (base)
P0 — Post pre-seed 0–6 Founder team + 1 engineer (contract), editor (part-time) $18–20k $15–18k (early revenue from consulting)
P1 — Seed ramp 6–12 + 1–2 engineers, BD lead, media lead $25–28k $18–22k (commissions + PRO + consulting)
P2 — Platform scale 12–21 + product, ops, regional BD (as needed) $30–35k $20–24k (growing recurring revenue)

Net burn assumes base-case revenue trajectory. In conservative scenarios, hiring pace is slowed to keep runway > 18 months; upside allows bringing some hires forward.

Capital plan

Three steps to $1.0M raised with controlled dilution.

Capital is structured to derisk milestones, not to maximise headline round size. Numbers below are directional to show logic — final terms are negotiable.

Rounds & use — high level

Round Size Main purpose Key milestones
Pre-seed $100k MVP & first partners RFQ engine live, 3–5 partners, 2–4 pilots, first revenue.
Seed $400k 18–21m runway Full platform for launches + contractors + data, 6–10 deals/yr, 40–70 PRO seats.
Growth $500k Marketplace & apps Mobile apps, payments, higher GMV, regional scaling, ARR $1.9–3.5M.

If an investor prefers, pre-seed and seed can be combined into a single $500k seed round, keeping the same milestone logic and use-of-funds structure.

Illustrative valuation & ownership (founder-friendly)

Round Amount Pre-money Post-money New investor % Cumulative dilution
Pre-seed $0.10M $2.5M $2.6M ≈3.8% ≈3.8%
Seed $0.40M $4.0M $4.4M ≈9.1% ≈12.6%
Growth $0.50M $12.0M $12.5M ≈4.0% ≈16.0%

Directional 5-year outcome: at $5M ARR (base) and 3–8× revenue multiples, this implies $15–40M valuation. At $12M ARR (upside), $36–96M. Gravity’s current raises are intentionally priced to leave room for future institutional capital.

KPIs

18-month and 5-year quantitative targets.

The focus is on actionable, trackable metrics: partners, RFQs, deals, GMV, ARR and PRO base.

18-month KPIs (seed horizon · base case)

Metric Target range Comment
Active partners 8–15 Launch providers, manufacturers, integrators, data vendors.
RFQs per year 12–24 Structured and validated; not raw leads.
Closed deals per year 6–10 Including launches, missions and data/consulting projects.
GMV per year $5–10M At 4–5% take rate this underpins the revenue targets.
PRO paying seats 40–70 Combination of enterprise and individual accounts.
ARR (run-rate) $0.3–0.8M Across commissions, PRO, consulting and media.

5-year KPI direction (base scenario)

Year GMV # deals PRO seats ARR Key milestone
Y1 $2.8M 7 25 $0.30M MVP monetisation, first case studies.
Y2 $8.1M 18 90 $0.95M Platform adoption, multiple regions.
Y3 $16.0M 32 200 $1.90M Gravity as working operating layer.
Y4 $28–35M 50–60 350–450 $3.20M Marketplace & mobile fully live.
Y5 $45–60M 70–90 600–800 $5.00M Gravity as default digital entry point to space.

These KPIs are designed to be trackable in quarterly reporting to investors and to align fundraising tempo with real traction — not with hype cycles.